It was a grueling day of pitches stretching from 8 in the morning until 6 in the evening but when the dust settled on the first Tech23, some new startup stars had emerged from the Australian tech scene. Nearly 50 technology businesses converged in Surry Hills Tuesday to showcase the nation’s technology innovations before an audience that included successful tech entrepreneurs, VC and angel investors and some of the nations most seasoned consultants and tech service providers. Organized by Rachel Slattery’s events and PR company Slattery IT, the event ran in a TechCrunch50 style format with expert panelists evaluating the 4 minute pitches of companies in six categories which included “Consumer Web”, “Meeting the Needs of the Enterprise”, “Mobile Communications”, “Green Clean and Inbetween”, “Digital Media” and “SaaS/In the Cloud”. Although the event’s winners have not yet been announced, a cursory look at the day’s Twitter feed and who was swamped with business cards after their speech gives some pretty clear insight into the audience favorites.
Over at the ANZA Tech blog, Viki Forrest picked a candidate from each category that she thought was best, naming QMcodes, Posse, Red Lizard Software, Heard System, We Are Hunted and Simmersion as tops. Posse is no stranger around the Australian investment scene, which was best showcased when co-founder Rebekah Campbell was asked what she was looking for from the event and said that when they originally applied it was funding, but in the few months since that’s not so much the case. Posse presented at the selective Innovation Bay a few months ago and walked away with success. Melbourne-based startup QMcodes used the opportunity to announce a new forward-facing brand they would be operating under known as Link.Me. Heard had a high entertainment factor with CEO Ed Catherwood aiming what looked like a red dust buster at Rachel Slattery. The startup’s light hearted presentation of a sonogram system for cattle and horses shone amongst of a group of convoluted green technology pitches.
But much of the day’s excitement centered around Brisbane startup We Are Hunted, who presented a well crafted presentation made up of hand-drawn images. We Are Hunted uses a proprietary algorithm of blogs, social networking sites and more to calculate the top song being searched for across the web. The sites revenue comes not only from selling songs via itunes, amazon and InSound, but in selling the data gathered in the process of figuring out what songs are being buzzed about. The public view of the site is elegant and uncluttered and hides all the complex research that likely goes into creating what appears on there. On a personal note, it reminds me of a far neater and easier-to-navigate version of HypeMachine.
The event wasn’t without a few hard lessons in presentation and a few rough grillings from the panel, but some the key take aways from myself and others around the blogosphere:
• If your product is requiring the audience to change their behavior in order to use it, you must figure out how you are going to get them to do this and if they are truly willing to. This question was presented to Desktop360 who offer a rotating, web interactive desktop background.
• What is the life of your product? How long is this technology or trend going to exist?
• Investors don’t just invest in technology, they invest in the team of people behind it. We talked about this fact in a previous blog when it was revealed in the Wholesale Investor magazine survey that the team behind a company was one of the top factors investors looked at when it came to an investment. It’s good to include some of your team’s past successes and accomplishments and to present yourselves as reliable people, not just people presenting a reliable product.
• From the mouth of Pollenizer’s Phile Morle, don’t put so many industry terms and jargon into your presentation that it makes it hard to quickly recognize what the product your offering is and what the value is. Pollenizer helped coach at least two of the day’s presenters and have a wealth of experience in getting a complicated message across.
• Pitching is about dealing with people and selling. It doesn’t matter how great your product is if you can’t stand up, look people in the eyes and explain and sell your product. If you can’t do this, get coaching. If you’re incorrigible, consider hiring someone who can sell and pitch for you. The Green, Clean and Inbetween panel became hard to watch at times simply due to a lack of basic presentation skills.
You can read some of the other wrapups here and here. And view the pitched for Angusta, Hiive, Personal Audio and Myzerr below.







[...] • Tech23 startup IPscape launched he-said-she-said, a hosted voice recording service for compliance that can be implemented in 24 hours. He-said-she-said can be used by call centre agents or sales team members to record inbound and / or outbound customer calls for management, compliance or quality assurance reasons. Using cloud-based technology, voice recording is simply and automatically added to every inbound and outbound call. [...]
[...] didn’t catch all of Geoff’s presentation we’ve embedded it below. Thanks to the IPitch guys for making it available. The camera follows Geoff rather than the presentation (slides can be [...]
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by antonymd: RT @tweetmeme IPitch - Tech23 Draws Out Whos Who of Tech http://retwt.me/1Fo25...
[...] put a lot of value on the pitch. With events like Pitch Club, Tech23 and IdeaPitch we hold it as this golden jewel of business that will send investors salivating. But [...]
[...] for one as the other, but there are a number of a factors that are eerily alike. After all…wasn’t the Innovation Island at Tech23 just a little bit like a parade ring before seeing the startups going head to head? Hopefully this [...]
A risk with delaying your patent is that you’re leaving it open for someone else getting in first.
And if you pay for a round or two of patent searches before drafting your patent (as I did), you’ll be blown away by how much is already out there.
And you should be guided by THAT (rather than the possibility of discovering some improved method down the track).
I’m assuming here that the point is to patent an invention that’s as broad as possible, to give you as much protection as possible, and (more importantly in my view) to make it as valuable an asset as possible to the company that’s going to buy you…….
rather than patenting the EXACT design you go to market with.
If you know your stuff, you’ll have conceived a powerful idea when you first walk in the patent attorney’s door.
And you won’t want to run the risk of having that whittled down by delaying the lodgement.
If you’ve got a broad enough patent, its breadth will be what makes it valuable to investors later…..
and it will hopefully be broad enough to encompass whatever fine-tuning you do between lodging it and going to market with whatever you go to market with.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mark Cohen and Antony McGregor Dey, We Are Hunted. We Are Hunted said: "..exciting Brisbane startup We Are Hunted presented a well-crafted presentation of hand-drawn images" (via @IPitchAU) http://bit.ly/1mcxKN [...]
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by IPitch Australia, IPitch Australia. IPitch Australia said: A full report on #Tech23 and video pitches from @myzerr , QMcodes, @Hiive , Angusta , Simmersion and Personal Audio: http://bit.ly/2Ol7iu [...]